We value your privacy
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, serve personalized ads or content, and analyze our traffic. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies.
We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.
The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ...
Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.
No cookies to display.
Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.
No cookies to display.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
No cookies to display.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
No cookies to display.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.
No cookies to display.
Hong Kong has enacted a stringent security law, defended by authorities as crucial for stability but critiqued by opponents as a threat to civil liberties. This legislation, known as Article 23, introduces new crimes such as external interference and insurrection, with penalties extending to life imprisonment. The law swiftly passed through the pro-Beijing legislative body of the city within a fortnight.
This new statute builds upon the already contentious National Security Law (NSL) implemented by China, which outlaws acts of secession, subversion, terrorism, and collusion with foreign entities in Hong Kong.
John Lee, Hong Kong’s Chief Executive, argues that Article 23 is vital to protect against threats and disruptive ideologies, celebrating its passage as a long-awaited milestone. Similarly, China’s Vice-Premier Ding Xuexiang underscored the law’s importance for safeguarding national interests and promoting economic progress.
The enactment of Article 23 has sparked significant concern among human rights organizations and international figures, who warn it signifies a move towards authoritarianism in Hong Kong. Critics, including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, highlight the law’s potential to instill a culture of fear and suppress dissent.
The United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and the UK’s Foreign Secretary have also expressed disapproval, foreseeing further encroachments on freedoms in the territory.
Local citizens share apprehensions about the vague language of the law, fearing its broad definitions could easily ensnare ordinary activities under severe offences. This atmosphere of uncertainty has fostered a cautious approach to workplace discussions and a noticeable exodus of professionals abroad.
Specific concerns arise regarding the “external interference” clause, which some fear could implicate individuals and organizations engaging with foreign entities in legal jeopardy.
As the law quickly becomes reality, questions persist about the absence of public discourse and the rapid legislative process, contrasting sharply with a previous attempt in 2003 that was halted by mass protests. Despite government assurances that the law targets only those endangering national security, the broad scope and swift enactment of Article 23 continue to stir debate and anxiety among Hong Kong’s residents and the international community.
© 2023 Global Updates